Archives for posts with tag: Kathe Kollwitz
Self Portrait of Elfriede Lohse Wachtler, 1930. picture from : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ELW-Selbstportrait.jpg

Self Portrait of Elfriede Lohse Wachtler, 1930. picture from : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ELW-Selbstportrait.jpg

In my summer project I came across the Nazi’s policy on the arts. Kathe Kollwitz was forced out of her job at the Prussian Academy. Kollwitz was one of many, Expressionists and Modernists alike, who were targeted by the Nazi party for various reasons, their work was un – German, degenerate, they were communists or Jewish or the Nazi’s simply didn’t like their work. Hitler in his youth had applied to art school in Vienna, he was rejected. Some historians believe that this was a key point in his hatred of Modernism and also Hitler of course blamed all the Jews and Communists in Vienna art school for his rejection as he associated them with what he labelled as degenerate art. This evolved into the Degenerate art show or Entartete Kunst. Many great artists were put in the show and were terribly affected by the Nazi’s policy on the arts. Paul Klee, Max Beckmann and Otto Dix like Kollwitz all lost their positions at the Academies they worked for. Unlike Kollwitz they were forced or decided to leave Germany. Others like Ernst Ludwig Kirchner committed suicide after their work was removed from public exhibition. There is a whole lost generation of artists and artwork from this period. Not only was artwork banned and destroyed, but some artists were banned from painting and buying art materials. Artists were destroyed. I came across a female artist by the name of Elfriede Lohse Wachtler, who had her artwork banned and destroyed, she had several mental breakdowns because of this. She was put in a psychiatric hospital where is continued to paint but in 1935 she was forcibly sterilised under Nazi legislation and in 1940 she was murdered as part of the forced euthanasia program. With Entartete Kunst and the other policies the Nazi’s sought to first embarrass and ridicule the artists they deemed inferior then scrub them from history. We are still finding hordes of lost artwork and rediscovering artists like Wachtler who were so totally suppressed by the regime. A question that arose in the discussion after the lecture on this topic, was what would you do in this situation, would you flee or stay. Or if asked, like many were including Hugo Boss and Leni Riefenstahl, would you have worked for the regime or would you refuse and face retribution. In this there are so many variables, do you view a job as a job, how much do you know about the party and there policies, is it worth it? Its easy in hindsight to say that you would say no. It’s not clear-cut, its such a difficult question to answer, I would hope that I would have had the knowledge of the situation to say no but what if you didn’t really know who the Nazi’s were apart that they were in charge and they were offering you a job, for a struggling artist why wouldn’t you take a job such as this. But again unless you were really there its impossible to know the full truth.

page from Marjane Satrapi's Persepolis, 2008. picture from : http://parrishlantern.blogspot.co.uk/2011/07/marjane-satrapi.html

page from Marjane Satrapi’s Persepolis, 2008. picture from : http://parrishlantern.blogspot.co.uk/2011/07/marjane-satrapi.html

I want to move on and discus contemporary examples of artists who have lived similar political unrest and destruction. Marjane Satrapi, the author of Persepolis and Embroideries, is to my mind one such artist and shares comparisons with Kathe Kollwitz. Both came from a modern middle class family for their times. Their families supported and nurtured a variety of religious and political beliefs among them a support of the political left. Satrapi and Kollwitz both faced prejudice because of their sex. This is very apparent in Satrapi’s autobiography Persepolis as she was forced to wear the veil after Iran’s revolution led to Muslim fundamentalists taking control. Even in their work there is a similar raw feel to it and the use of black and white imagery. Both faced danger and intimidation from their governments. I love Satrapi’s work, the illustrations are simple maybe even crude but they portray such emotion that I find them echoing the raw expressiveness of Kollwitz’s woodcuts. Kollwitz remained in Germany during the war, I wonder what kept her there, her husband was dead and she had to leave her studios. Maybe it was the fact that despite everything Germany was her home and she knew she was going to die. In her last works she shows herself reaching out to Death coming arms. She had contemplated her own mortality and depicted human mortality so often in her artwork its almost she had accepted this end. Satrapi left her home country because her parents feared for her safety. I cannot imagine what it must be like to have to flee your home country. Satrapi returned to Iran and studied art, she was and is very vocal in her political opinions. For example how can you successfully study life drawing if the model is swathed head to toe in unfitted black fabric. She questioned this while at University.

It would be naïve to think that art and design is now free to do and say what ever it wants. Its not, artists are still being imprisoned, and shut down ( for example Ai Weiwei). Yes, we has free speech but it takes a very strong and convicted person to standby their views in the face of a totalitarian regime. Saying that, those artists who left Germany were not and will never be cowards or less in any way. They were just as strong as those who stayed, they faced a whole new world and spread the legacy of movements like the Bauhaus and German Expressionism.

References and Links to webpages that helped me write this post :

BURNS, L. BBC article on Why Hitler Hated Modernism. Available at : http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-24819441

Wikipedia Degenerate Art. Available at : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degenerate_art

Wikipedia Degenerate Art Exhibition. Available at : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degenerate_Art_Exhibition

KUHNEL, A. Moma, Degenerate Art. Available at : http://www.moma.org/collection/theme.php?theme_id=10077

JONES, J. What the Nazi’s didn’t want you to see. Available at : http://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/aug/16/secondworldwar

All of the above links were accessed on the 29.11.2013.

Satrapi, M. (2006) Persepolis. London. Jonathon Cape.

Satrapi, M. (2008) Embroideries. London. Jonathon Cape.

” There is this curious silence surrounding the expulsion of my work from the Academy show … Scarcely anyone had anything to say to me about it. I thought people would come, or at least write – but no. Such a silence around us. “

 

An extract from Kathe Kollwitz diary, on her expulsion from the Prussian Academy by decree of the Nazis. It brings up a question about the reaction of the German people to such policies and decrees. Were Kollwitz’s colleagues scared to talk to her for fear of retribution?, were they indifferent to her plight or did they support the Nazis actions?

Kollwitz, K. (1955) The Diary and Letters of Kathe Kollwitz. Henry Regnery.

2013-09-08 16.35.06

As I was saying in my previous post, Kathe Kollwitz was a pretty amazing person. She faced get adversity ( in simple terms she was hated on by the Kaiser pre WW1, then after WW1 she was hated on by the communists, the socialist coalition government which was influenced by the monarchists, and then hated on by the Nazis. ) In addition she suffered many personal tragedies, the death of her son in WW1, the death of her grandson in WW2 and the death of her husband. Her work was extremely personal to her because of this. She was set apart due to her political views and also because she was female.  From 1933 onwards Kollwitz like many other leftists began to lose everything, she was forced out of her position at the Prussian Academy, she was questioned and threatened by the Gestapo, her artwork was banned and put into the Nazis Degenerate art show or Entartete Kunst. Her husband was banned from working as a doctor in Berlin. Her large sculpture studio at the academy was trashed and her family home and studio was bombed during the Berlin Bombing meaning much of her work was lost or destroyed along with her personal items. Kollwitz’s last series of works concerned her relationship with death. Kollwitz was no stranger to portraying death, exploring her own mortality and it can be seen in her artwork that she had anticipated her own death. One of these such works is a simple charcoal drawing showing Kollwitz reaching up to death beckoning hand. Kollwitz died just before the end of the war in 1945. From her own death at the end of her career to revolution at the beginning of her career. Kollwitz told the stories of the people of Germany who went against the tide and those who were drowning in it. She was one of a few artists who chose this subject matter within Germany at this time while others concentrated on the glitz and glamour of the highly lucrative art deco lifestyle.

Here is a link to the page on the Moma website all about Kathe Kollwitz :

http://www.moma.org/collection_ge/browse_results.php?criteria=O:AD:E:3201|A:AR:E:1&role=1 ( HESS, H. Kathe Kollwitz bio. accessed 25.9.2013.)

Kathe Kollwitz inspired drawings for my summer project.

Two drawings inspired by two of Kollwitz’s works, the one on the left is a close up of her drawing of a mourning mother/widow, inspired by her own experiences. The one on the right is my version of one of her many self – portraits.

Kollwitz worked primarily in woodcut and lithography. I will be trying my hand at lithography in a couple of weeks. I’ve looked it up and its fairly straightforward just a lot of stages and a lot of washing plates. Woodcut on the other hand is simpler, you get a piece of wood and some shape implements and carve out an image. Which you then ink up and place paper on and repeat and add to as many times as you want to create a more details image. The expressionists favoured woodcut as its difficult and hard going to carve. But this made it more emotive and more expressive. It also worked well with harsh subject matters and really lets the image and its story shine through in simple black and white. Though Kollwitz trained as a painter, most of her work consisted of series of lithographs or woodcuts and pencil and charcoal studies. She also created sculptures. Though after her dismissal from the Prussian academy is lost her large sculpture studio. And was unable the carry on with that avenue of her work.

The Japanese also used woodblock printing. Though some printing techniques may seem tedious they were and are quicker and more reliable than replicating images by hand. Moveable type and printed image are essential to communication design. They make art accessible, affordable and efficient. Mass production of art and text is part of illustration. Prints can be mass produced but they can also be limited edition or single copies giving them infinite value.

Book used for help with this post –  Martin, J. (1993) The Encyclopaedia of  Printmaking Techniques. Quarto Publishing.

More pictures that I did for my summer project

This one is more Emil Nolde inspired than Kollwitz inspired. But like Kollwitz, Nolde is associated with Art Nouveau and German Expression.

1379538123431

I realised I should probably post about my summer project. Our brief was to explore “what has gone before”. Now when you type the history of illustration into Google, what comes up is pretty vague and useless. Perfect excuse to buy some illustration books off amazon. The book that I found most helpful was “Illustration, a visual history” by Heller & Chwast Abrams. As it containes the main illustrative movements and styles. Which was really helpful for me as I didn’t really know a lot about the history of illustration, and I didn’t want to pick my favourite illustrator, Mike Mignola. I wanted to go further back, see if I could trace some of my favourite styles back to their origins. I also really love history, if I hadn’t got into DJCAD, I would be in second year at Stirling studying history and religion. So the first half of my project sketchbook is just written research and pictures exploring the history of illustration. I eventually settled on the work of the German Expressionists, specifically Kathe Kollwitz. This period of German history is an era that fascinates me. I studied Germany’s inter-war years for my Advanced Higher and wrote my dissertation on it as well. So finding Kathe Kollwitz, was amazing, a woman who lived and worked pre WW1 to the end of WW2. Her work is so refreshing and simple to me, as well as her story. She drew the reality of war and the inter – war years in Germany, something which isn’t really discussed. She was a woman beyond her time, and so were her parents, when she told her father she was getting married he feared it would ruin her artistic career. It didn’t, in a way her career flourished when she and her husband, a doctor, moved to Berlin. She really cared about the war torn impoverished families who visited her husbands clinic. Her political and moral sensibility probably had a lot to do with this, but also the fact that she herself was no stranger to sorrow, as she lost her son in WW1. Her opinion towards war changed greatly from this moment onwards. In December 1943 she wrote in her diary:

Every war already carries within it the war which will answer it. Every war is answered by a new war until everything is smashed … that is why I am so wholeheartedly for a radical end to this madness and why my only hope is in a world Socialism, Pacifism simply is not a matter of calm looking on, it is work, hard work.”

Kathe Kollwitz was a pretty amazing lady. I find her work so inspiring, its expressive but its not fake. Its real and gritty. I admire her bravery.

Links and References :

Here is a link to the Kathe Kollwitz Museum website : http://www.kaethe-kollwitz.de/museum-en.htm (accessed 24.9.2013.)

Heller, S. Chwast, S. (2008) Illustration: A Visual History. New York. Abrams.

Kollwitz, K. (1955) The Diary and Letters of Kathe Kollwitz. Henry Regnery.